These paper article analyse the problem how the human rights are conceived and carried out made effective in the educational environment of two public high schools of the state system of education in Brazil, based on students’ perceptions and teacher’s opinions. Objectives of the study: Aligned to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) from 1948, as well as the fundamentals and the historical and legal milestones, the study proposes to identify youth perceptions and teacher’s opinions about the implementation of human rights in the school environment and its manifestations in educational practices. Methodology: We used a questionnaire with open-ended and close-ended questions to students (45) and interviews with open-ended questions to teachers (17). The categories analysed were organised in: tolerance and respect to differences and diversities, gender equality, respectful attitude towards sexual orientation, age differences, environmental care, experience in peace and solidarity situations, valorisation and respect to cultural diversities. Conclusions: Research results analysis of both in students’ and teachers’ perceptions revealed that in schooling context, considering the established interactions between teachers and students, and students between themselves, pointed to occasional situations of discrimination and prejudice hidden into “pleasantries” and “jokes” emulating ideological strategies of concealment and dissimulation of attitudes regarding lack of respect to the human dignity, considered a universal principle to the establishment of human rights.
Published in | Education Journal (Volume 8, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.edu.20190801.11 |
Page(s) | 1-10 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Education in Human Rights, School, Respect, Educational Practices, Human Dignity
[1] | Palau-Wolffe, F. (2016). Empowering Our Youth Through Human Rights Education: The International and National Promise of Whole-School Approaches. Empowering Youth through Human Rights Education, Vol. 2, 30. |
[2] | The United Nations Decade for Human Rights Education, 1995 - 2004. Lessons for the life, 1, 1-87. |
[3] | Rodrigues, D. Human rights and inclusion. Oeiras: Profedições, 2016, p. 88. |
[4] | Eynga, A. M., Pacievtcha, T., D’Almeida, M. L. & Gisi, M. L. (2016). Evaluation and human rights educational policies: contradictions between regulation and emancipation in basic education in Brazil. Ensaio: avaliação políticas públicas Educativas 92, 24, n. 92, 670-696. |
[5] | Kingston, L. (2014). The Rise of Human Rights Education: Opportunities, Challenges. Societies Without Borders 9:2, 188-210. |
[6] | Palau-Wolffe, F. (2016). Empowering Our Youth Through Human Rights Education: The International and National Promise of Whole-School Approaches. Empowering Youth through Human Rights Education, Vol. 2, 30-38. |
[7] | Dum, J. (2016). Social Value, Children, and the Human Right to Education. Dilemata, nº21, 127-149. |
[8] | Teodoro, A. Education in times of neoliberal globalization. l. Brasília: Liber Livro Editora, 2011, p. 24. |
[9] | Santos, B. S. (Dir.) Globalization: fatality or utopia? Porto: Afrontamento, 2001. |
[10] | Delors, J. Education: a treasure to discover: report to UNESCO of the International Commission on education for the 21ST Century. (7th ed.). São Paulo: Cortez, 2005, p. 53. |
[11] | Carvalho, M. J. Brás, J. V., & Gonçalves, M. N. (2015). The Organization of the school and vocational education: the self-government of António Sérgio. Revista História da Educação 19, 131-144. |
[12] | Locke, J. Essay concerning human understanding. São Paulo: Editora Nova Cultural, 1999, 1 st ed. 1690) |
[13] | Bobbio, N. The era of the rights. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2004, p. 35. |
[14] | Cazuquel, H. M. (2004). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the future of mankind: philosophical concepts and your effectiveness. Análise & Dados 14, 37- 47. |
[15] | Bobbio, N. The era of the rights Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2004, p. 15. |
[16] | Cazuquel, H. M. (2004). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the future of mankind: philosophical concepts and your effectiveness. Análise & Dados 14, 37- 47. |
[17] | Lohmann, G. (2013). Theoretical definitions of human rights of Jurgen Habermas: the legal principle and the fixes. Trans / Form / Ação 36, 87-102. |
[18] | Cademartori, L. H. U. & Grubba, L. S. (2012). The human rights Foundation and your relationship with the fundamental rights from the abstract: in dialogue with the theory of reinventing Human rights. Revista Direito GV 2, 703-724. |
[19] | Nations Unies [ONU]. (1948). The Universal Declaration of human rights. (Art. 1º, ONU, 1948, p. 2). Retrieved July 20, 2015, from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/por.pdf. |
[20] | Nations Unies [ONU]. (1948). The Universal Declaration of human rights. (Art. 26, ONU, 1948, p. 6). Retrieved July 20, 2015, from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/por.pdf. |
[21] | Tosi, G. The meaning and consequences of the Universal Declaration of 1948. Alagoras: UFPB, 2006, p. 5. |
[22] | Rosenfield, C. L., & Pauli, J. (2012). Beyond the dichotomy between decent work and decent work: recognition and human rights. Notebook CRH 25, 319-329. |
[23] | Bobbio, N. The era of the rights. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2004. |
[24] | Cazuquel, H. M. (2004). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the future of mankind: philosophical concepts and your effectiveness. Analysis & Data, 14, 37- 47. |
[25] | Tosi, G. (2006). The meaning and consequences of the Universal Declaration of 1948. Alagoras: UFPB, 2006, p. 6. |
[26] | Estevão, C. V. (2015). Abnormal times and new fantasies: new trends in human rights, justice and education. Portuguese Journal of Education, 28, 7-29. |
[27] | Garcia, B. P., & Lazari, R. (2015). Human rights manual, Salvador: Juspodivm, 2015, p. 87. |
[28] | Ferraz, A. C. C. Human rights education: a prerequisite for the exercise of citizenship. In V. O., Silveira, S. H. F. N., Sanches., & M. B., Couto (Org.). Legal education. São Paulo: Editora Saraiva, 2013, p. 87. |
[29] | Nations Unies [ONU]. (1998). The United Nations Decade for Human Rights Education, 1995 - 2004. Lições para a Vida, 1, 1-87. |
[30] | UNESCO, Building peace in the minds of the men and the women, 2012, p. 3. |
[31] | Estevão, C. V. (2011). Democracy, human rights and education: towards a critical perspective of education for human rights. Lusofone Revue of Education, 17, 11-30. |
[32] | Cazuquel, H. M. (2004). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the future of mankind: philosophical concepts and your effectiveness. Analysis & Data, 14, 37- 47. |
[33] | Parecer CNE/CP nº 8/2012 de 6 de março. National guidelines for human rights education. Retrieved May 10, 2016, from http://portal.mec.gov.br/index.php?option=com_docman&view=download&alias=10389-pcp008-12-pdf&category_slug=marco-2012-pdf&Itemid=30192. |
[34] | Claude, R. P. (2005). Right to education and human rights education. International Journal on human rights 2, 36-63. |
[35] | Santos, B. S. (2009). Human rights: the challenge of interculturality. Huma Revue, 2, 10-18. |
[36] | Goulão, J. The future of human rights. Lisbon: Nova Veiga, 2015, p. 51. |
[37] | Fernandes, A. C. et al. Education on multiculturalism (integration). Lisboa, 2007, p. 41. |
[38] | Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. Qualitative research in education: an introduction to theory and methods. Porto: Porto Editora, 1994, p. 49. |
[39] | Quivy, R., & Van Campenhoudt, L. Handbook of research in social sciences. Lisboa: Gradiva, 1998, p. 191. |
[40] | Lakatos, E. M., & Marconi, M. A.. Fundamentals of scientific methodology (5th ed.). São Paulo: Atlas. Lakatos and Marconi, 2003. |
[41] | Esteves, M. Content analysis. In J. A., Lima, & J. A., Pacheco (Orgs.). Doing research: contributions to the preparation of dissertations and theses. Porto: Porto Editora, 2006, p. 108. |
[42] | Garcia, B. P., & Lazari, R. Human rights manual (2nd ed.). Salvador: Juspodivm, 2015. |
[43] | Ramos, A. H.. Meanings in dispute in the discourse of rights education curriculum (doctoral thesis) Rio de Janeiro: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2010, p. 130. |
[44] | Santos, B. S. Education at the crossroads of rival paradigms. Retrieved August 20, 2016, from http://www.op-edu.eu/files/2016-03/boaventura-cne-final1marco-2016.pdf. 2016, pp. 3-4. |
[45] | Rodrigues, D. Human rights and inclusion. Oeiras: Profedições, 2016, p. 53. |
[46] | Bloemraad, I (2018) Theorising the power of citizenship as claims-making, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44:1, 4-26, DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1396108 |
[47] | Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. Qualitative research in education: an introduction to theory and methods. Porto: Porto Editora, 1994, p. 49. |
[48] | Quivy, R., & Van Campenhoudt, L. Manual of social science research. Lisboa: Gradiva, 1998, p. 191. |
[49] | Lakatos, E. M., & Marconi, M. A. Fundamentals of scientific methodology (5th ed.). São Paulo: Atlas. Lakatos and Marconi, 2003. |
[50] | Esteves, M. Content analysis. In J. A., Lima, & J. A., Pacheco (Orgs.). Doing research: contributions to the preparation of dissertations and theses. Porto: Porto Editora, 2006, p. 108. |
[51] | Garcia, B. P., & Lazari, R. (2015). Human rights manual, Salvador: Juspodivm, 2015, p. 87. |
[52] | Ramos, A. H. Meanings in dispute in the discourse of rights education curriculum. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, , 2010, p. 130. |
[53] | Santos, B. S. Education at the crossroads of rival paradigms. Retrieved August 20, 2016, from http://www.op-edu.eu/files/2016-03/boaventura-cne-final1marco-2016.pdf. 2016, pp. 3-4. |
[54] | Rodrigues, D. Human rights and inclusion. Oeiras: Profedições, 2016, p. 88. |
[55] | Bloemraad, I (2018) Theorising the power of citizenship as claims-making, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44:1, 4-26, DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1396108 |
[56] | Koç, C. & Köybaşi, F. (2016). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning and their attitudes towards multicultural education. Educational Research and Reviews, Vol. 11(22), 2048-2056. DOI: 10.5897/ERR2016.3009. |
APA Style
Francisca Barros Matos, Maria Neves Gonçalves, José Viegas Brás. (2019). Education in Human Rights: Conceptions and Educational Practices. Education Journal, 8(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20190801.11
ACS Style
Francisca Barros Matos; Maria Neves Gonçalves; José Viegas Brás. Education in Human Rights: Conceptions and Educational Practices. Educ. J. 2019, 8(1), 1-10. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20190801.11
AMA Style
Francisca Barros Matos, Maria Neves Gonçalves, José Viegas Brás. Education in Human Rights: Conceptions and Educational Practices. Educ J. 2019;8(1):1-10. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20190801.11
@article{10.11648/j.edu.20190801.11, author = {Francisca Barros Matos and Maria Neves Gonçalves and José Viegas Brás}, title = {Education in Human Rights: Conceptions and Educational Practices}, journal = {Education Journal}, volume = {8}, number = {1}, pages = {1-10}, doi = {10.11648/j.edu.20190801.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20190801.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.edu.20190801.11}, abstract = {These paper article analyse the problem how the human rights are conceived and carried out made effective in the educational environment of two public high schools of the state system of education in Brazil, based on students’ perceptions and teacher’s opinions. Objectives of the study: Aligned to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) from 1948, as well as the fundamentals and the historical and legal milestones, the study proposes to identify youth perceptions and teacher’s opinions about the implementation of human rights in the school environment and its manifestations in educational practices. Methodology: We used a questionnaire with open-ended and close-ended questions to students (45) and interviews with open-ended questions to teachers (17). The categories analysed were organised in: tolerance and respect to differences and diversities, gender equality, respectful attitude towards sexual orientation, age differences, environmental care, experience in peace and solidarity situations, valorisation and respect to cultural diversities. Conclusions: Research results analysis of both in students’ and teachers’ perceptions revealed that in schooling context, considering the established interactions between teachers and students, and students between themselves, pointed to occasional situations of discrimination and prejudice hidden into “pleasantries” and “jokes” emulating ideological strategies of concealment and dissimulation of attitudes regarding lack of respect to the human dignity, considered a universal principle to the establishment of human rights.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Education in Human Rights: Conceptions and Educational Practices AU - Francisca Barros Matos AU - Maria Neves Gonçalves AU - José Viegas Brás Y1 - 2019/01/19 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20190801.11 DO - 10.11648/j.edu.20190801.11 T2 - Education Journal JF - Education Journal JO - Education Journal SP - 1 EP - 10 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2327-2619 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20190801.11 AB - These paper article analyse the problem how the human rights are conceived and carried out made effective in the educational environment of two public high schools of the state system of education in Brazil, based on students’ perceptions and teacher’s opinions. Objectives of the study: Aligned to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) from 1948, as well as the fundamentals and the historical and legal milestones, the study proposes to identify youth perceptions and teacher’s opinions about the implementation of human rights in the school environment and its manifestations in educational practices. Methodology: We used a questionnaire with open-ended and close-ended questions to students (45) and interviews with open-ended questions to teachers (17). The categories analysed were organised in: tolerance and respect to differences and diversities, gender equality, respectful attitude towards sexual orientation, age differences, environmental care, experience in peace and solidarity situations, valorisation and respect to cultural diversities. Conclusions: Research results analysis of both in students’ and teachers’ perceptions revealed that in schooling context, considering the established interactions between teachers and students, and students between themselves, pointed to occasional situations of discrimination and prejudice hidden into “pleasantries” and “jokes” emulating ideological strategies of concealment and dissimulation of attitudes regarding lack of respect to the human dignity, considered a universal principle to the establishment of human rights. VL - 8 IS - 1 ER -