There are a huge number of motives and 60 theories explaining them. However, it is not possible to compare the significance of various motives for an individual — there may be too many motives. And accordingly, the issues related to their testing becomes a very large number. Therefore, conclusions have to be made on the example of a very small sample of the most sought-after motifs. A technique is proposed that allows one to obtain the results of comparing a large number of motives with a relatively small number of questions asked. The test consists of 47 questions with pairwise opposition of 11 different motives. The result is obtained by solving a system of linear equations. As a result of the work done, we can predict the behavior of anyone tested, say what he chooses in a given life situation, if it can be interpreted as a confrontation between two motives. To assess the significance of the motive, a rating system was used, in which the motive rating was the higher, the more there was a choice in its favor in pairwise comparison with all other motives. The difference in the ratings of the two motives is linearly related to the probability of choosing both motives. This allows you to create a rating hierarchy of the motives of the subject without direct testing based on his decisions in everyday situations. The indicated method overcomes the well-known problem of the avalanche-like growth of the number of test questions with a large number of motives and forms the probabilistic value of the evaluation of the choice of one of the alternatives. A small number of questions allows you to significantly increase the value of the retest reliability of the answers of the subjects.
| Published in | Education Journal (Volume 8, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.edu.20190805.12 |
| Page(s) | 175-184 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Motives, Values, Motive Importance, Selection Probability
| [1] | Talanov V. L., Malkina-Pykh I. G. Handbook of Practical Psychologist \ SPb.: Sova, Moscow: EKSMO, 2002. - 928 p. |
| [2] | Heckhausen H. Motivation and Action. Vol. 1-2. – Moscow. – 1986. |
| [3] | Ilyin E. P. Motivation and Motives. - Saint Petersburg. - 2006. |
| [4] | Ilyin E. P. The Essence and Structure of a Motive // Psychological Journal. -1995. – Iss. 2. |
| [5] | Polozov A. A., Skoryh S. A. Evaluation of a Motivational Model of People with Different Personality and Character Types / Sport Psychologist, Iss. 1, 2012, Moscow. |
| [6] | Leontiev D. A. Systemic and Semantic Nature and Functions of a Motive // MSU Bulletin.-1993. - Iss. |
| [7] | Maslow A. Motivation and Personality. - Moscow. - 1998. |
| [8] | Psychological Structure Modules in Sport / A. A. Polozov, N. N. Polozova / Moscow: Sovetsky Sport Publishing House, 2009, 380 p. |
| [9] | Milman V. E. Internal and External Motivation of Learning Activity // Issues of Psychology. - 1987. - Iss. 5. |
| [10] | Richard M. Ryan. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions/ Contemporary Educational Psychology/Volume 25, Issue 1, January 2000, Pages 54-67. |
| [11] | Human Motivation /David C. McClelland/ CUP Archive, 1987. 663 p. |
| [12] | Magomed-Eminov M. Sh. Achievement Motivation: Structure and Mechanisms: Synopsis of a Thesis for... Candidate of Psychological Sciences. – Moscow, 1987. |
| [13] | Magomed-Eminov M. Sh. Psychodiagnostics of Motivation // General Psychodiagnostics. - Moscow, 1998. |
| [14] | A Study on the Achievement Motivation. Methodical manual. Compiled by B. G. Rebzuev, Acad. Ed. V. N. Panferov. - Saint Petersburg. - 1993. |
| [15] | Human Motivation /B. Weiner/ Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. - p. 480. |
| [16] | Ulitova E. S. Motivational Analysis of a Person's Behaviour over Time: Synopsis of a Thesis for... Candidate of Psychological Sciences. - Moscow, 1988. |
| [17] | Martsinkovskaya T. D. History of Psychology. - Moscow. - 2001. |
| [18] | Dodonov B. I. Structure and Dynamics of Motives of Activity // Issues of Psychology. – 1984. – Iss. 4. |
| [19] | Polozov A. A. Psychological Portraits of Sport Club Staff // Sport Psychologist, Iss. 3 (6), 2005. Ratings and Rankings in Sports: Past, Present, and Future / A. A. Polozov / Sovetsky Sport Publishing House, 2007. 310 p. |
APA Style
Andrey Polozov, Liudmila Brekhova. (2019). Methods of Testing a Large Number of Motives for Vocational Guidance. Education Journal, 8(5), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20190805.12
ACS Style
Andrey Polozov; Liudmila Brekhova. Methods of Testing a Large Number of Motives for Vocational Guidance. Educ. J. 2019, 8(5), 175-184. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20190805.12
AMA Style
Andrey Polozov, Liudmila Brekhova. Methods of Testing a Large Number of Motives for Vocational Guidance. Educ J. 2019;8(5):175-184. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20190805.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.edu.20190805.12,
author = {Andrey Polozov and Liudmila Brekhova},
title = {Methods of Testing a Large Number of Motives for Vocational Guidance},
journal = {Education Journal},
volume = {8},
number = {5},
pages = {175-184},
doi = {10.11648/j.edu.20190805.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20190805.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.edu.20190805.12},
abstract = {There are a huge number of motives and 60 theories explaining them. However, it is not possible to compare the significance of various motives for an individual — there may be too many motives. And accordingly, the issues related to their testing becomes a very large number. Therefore, conclusions have to be made on the example of a very small sample of the most sought-after motifs. A technique is proposed that allows one to obtain the results of comparing a large number of motives with a relatively small number of questions asked. The test consists of 47 questions with pairwise opposition of 11 different motives. The result is obtained by solving a system of linear equations. As a result of the work done, we can predict the behavior of anyone tested, say what he chooses in a given life situation, if it can be interpreted as a confrontation between two motives. To assess the significance of the motive, a rating system was used, in which the motive rating was the higher, the more there was a choice in its favor in pairwise comparison with all other motives. The difference in the ratings of the two motives is linearly related to the probability of choosing both motives. This allows you to create a rating hierarchy of the motives of the subject without direct testing based on his decisions in everyday situations. The indicated method overcomes the well-known problem of the avalanche-like growth of the number of test questions with a large number of motives and forms the probabilistic value of the evaluation of the choice of one of the alternatives. A small number of questions allows you to significantly increase the value of the retest reliability of the answers of the subjects.},
year = {2019}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Methods of Testing a Large Number of Motives for Vocational Guidance AU - Andrey Polozov AU - Liudmila Brekhova Y1 - 2019/08/10 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20190805.12 DO - 10.11648/j.edu.20190805.12 T2 - Education Journal JF - Education Journal JO - Education Journal SP - 175 EP - 184 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2327-2619 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20190805.12 AB - There are a huge number of motives and 60 theories explaining them. However, it is not possible to compare the significance of various motives for an individual — there may be too many motives. And accordingly, the issues related to their testing becomes a very large number. Therefore, conclusions have to be made on the example of a very small sample of the most sought-after motifs. A technique is proposed that allows one to obtain the results of comparing a large number of motives with a relatively small number of questions asked. The test consists of 47 questions with pairwise opposition of 11 different motives. The result is obtained by solving a system of linear equations. As a result of the work done, we can predict the behavior of anyone tested, say what he chooses in a given life situation, if it can be interpreted as a confrontation between two motives. To assess the significance of the motive, a rating system was used, in which the motive rating was the higher, the more there was a choice in its favor in pairwise comparison with all other motives. The difference in the ratings of the two motives is linearly related to the probability of choosing both motives. This allows you to create a rating hierarchy of the motives of the subject without direct testing based on his decisions in everyday situations. The indicated method overcomes the well-known problem of the avalanche-like growth of the number of test questions with a large number of motives and forms the probabilistic value of the evaluation of the choice of one of the alternatives. A small number of questions allows you to significantly increase the value of the retest reliability of the answers of the subjects. VL - 8 IS - 5 ER -
Email: