Due to the intensification of the homogeneity of higher education personnel training, the school running of traditional universities is seriously out of touch with the local economy and society. Developing applied undergraduates and cultivating high-level applied talents has become the mission of higher education to meet the needs of economic and social development and promote student development. Regarding the construction of application-oriented undergraduate professional curriculum standards, the education authority has not yet made clear guiding opinions. In the construction of professional curriculum system for talent training, universities can often only refer to traditional subject-based education curriculum standards, resulting in unclear levels of school goals, and it is difficult to cultivate an international and competitive high-level that truly meets the needs of economic and social development. Applied Talents. For this reason, this thesis takes the course evaluation standard construction research as the topic, combined with the CDIO model, according to the logical structure of the teaching object itself, combined with the actual situation in the teaching practice, research and propose an applied engineering major that can be used for reference A systematic theoretical framework for the construction of curriculum evaluation standards, and based on this theoretical framework, provides a set of practical cases of professional curriculum standard construction, and conducts exploratory promotion and implementation in 5 majors. Analyze the evaluation scores of the curriculum construction of 5 majors, and give specific measures to improve the evaluation standards of informatization courses, and provide theoretical guidance and practical reference for the construction of relevant professional curriculum standards.
Published in | Education Journal (Volume 10, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.edu.20211002.11 |
Page(s) | 40-45 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Curriculum Construction, Evaluation Standard, Information Technology, Sensitivity, Empirical Analysis
[1] | The weight determination method of the teaching quality evaluation index system of engineering colleges [J]. Wu Jianguo, Wu Haiyan, Zhang Jingqiang. China Adult Education. 2017 (17). |
[2] | Research on the weight of clinical teachers' classroom teaching quality evaluation index system—based on the analytic hierarchy process [J]. Dai Mengna, Wu Zhongli, Liu Yongwen, Yan Ping, Zhang Jianhua, Teng Wenjie. Medical Education Research and Practice. 2019 (03) |
[3] | The application of improved analytic hierarchy process in the evaluation of comprehensive quality of college students [J]. Cao Yupeng, Wang Zhijie, Hu Yongwen. Light Industry Science and Technology. 2018 (03). |
[4] | Teaching quality promotes learning performance evaluation modeling simulation [J]. Deng Leilei, Zhang Xian. Computer simulation. 2017 (07). |
[5] | Research on the impact of general education curriculum experience of college students on learning outcomes in my country [D]. Si Bairu. Dalian University of Technology 2019. |
[6] | Fu Xing. An Empirical Study on the Evaluation Index System of Classroom Teaching Quality in Colleges and Universities [J]. Higher Education Exploration, 2014 (4). |
[7] | The research, development and application of the emotional attitude value observation scale [J]. Yao Qiuping. Basic Education Curriculum. 2017 (13). |
[8] | Inquiry and practice of the "student-centered" applied undergraduate teaching evaluation index system—Taking Huashang College of Guangdong University of Finance and Economics as an example [J]. Lai Junfeng. Journal of Jiamusi Vocational College. 2019 (07). |
[9] | Focus on the students' curriculum experience-a study on teaching evaluation by students of the University of Melbourne [J]. Ji Xiaoxu, Hu Saiming, Zhu Zhiwu, Leng Wei, Lei Li. Shanghai Education Evaluation Research. 2018 (03). |
[10] | Research on the Evaluation Index System of University Teaching Quality Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process [J]. Zhu Yanjie. Journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College. 2017 (06). |
[11] | English teaching quality evaluation based on GA optimized RBF neural network [J]. Zhang Jushe. Computer System Application. 2020 (03). |
[12] | System combat effectiveness evaluation modeling method based on extreme learning machine [J]. Ren Tianzhu, Xin Wanqing, Yan Xijun, Zhao Hongyu, Zhou Tao. Missile and Space Launch Technology. 2019 (06). |
[13] | Research on the teaching effect of financial professional experimental courses based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method [J]. Cao Qiang, Yu Wenmei. Laboratory research and exploration. 2018 (06). |
[14] | English teaching quality evaluation based on principal component analysis and support vector machine [J]. Zhang Mingya. Modern Electronic Technology. 2018 (07). |
[15] | Research on Teaching Quality Evaluation Model Based on GA and BP Neural Network [J]. Yue Qi, Wen Xin. Journal of Inner Mongolia University (Natural Science Edition). 2018 (02). |
APA Style
Jiangtao Wang. (2021). Research on the Construction and Practice of Curriculum Evaluation Standards Based on CDIO Model. Education Journal, 10(2), 40-45. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211002.11
ACS Style
Jiangtao Wang. Research on the Construction and Practice of Curriculum Evaluation Standards Based on CDIO Model. Educ. J. 2021, 10(2), 40-45. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20211002.11
AMA Style
Jiangtao Wang. Research on the Construction and Practice of Curriculum Evaluation Standards Based on CDIO Model. Educ J. 2021;10(2):40-45. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20211002.11
@article{10.11648/j.edu.20211002.11, author = {Jiangtao Wang}, title = {Research on the Construction and Practice of Curriculum Evaluation Standards Based on CDIO Model}, journal = {Education Journal}, volume = {10}, number = {2}, pages = {40-45}, doi = {10.11648/j.edu.20211002.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211002.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.edu.20211002.11}, abstract = {Due to the intensification of the homogeneity of higher education personnel training, the school running of traditional universities is seriously out of touch with the local economy and society. Developing applied undergraduates and cultivating high-level applied talents has become the mission of higher education to meet the needs of economic and social development and promote student development. Regarding the construction of application-oriented undergraduate professional curriculum standards, the education authority has not yet made clear guiding opinions. In the construction of professional curriculum system for talent training, universities can often only refer to traditional subject-based education curriculum standards, resulting in unclear levels of school goals, and it is difficult to cultivate an international and competitive high-level that truly meets the needs of economic and social development. Applied Talents. For this reason, this thesis takes the course evaluation standard construction research as the topic, combined with the CDIO model, according to the logical structure of the teaching object itself, combined with the actual situation in the teaching practice, research and propose an applied engineering major that can be used for reference A systematic theoretical framework for the construction of curriculum evaluation standards, and based on this theoretical framework, provides a set of practical cases of professional curriculum standard construction, and conducts exploratory promotion and implementation in 5 majors. Analyze the evaluation scores of the curriculum construction of 5 majors, and give specific measures to improve the evaluation standards of informatization courses, and provide theoretical guidance and practical reference for the construction of relevant professional curriculum standards.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Research on the Construction and Practice of Curriculum Evaluation Standards Based on CDIO Model AU - Jiangtao Wang Y1 - 2021/03/10 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211002.11 DO - 10.11648/j.edu.20211002.11 T2 - Education Journal JF - Education Journal JO - Education Journal SP - 40 EP - 45 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2327-2619 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211002.11 AB - Due to the intensification of the homogeneity of higher education personnel training, the school running of traditional universities is seriously out of touch with the local economy and society. Developing applied undergraduates and cultivating high-level applied talents has become the mission of higher education to meet the needs of economic and social development and promote student development. Regarding the construction of application-oriented undergraduate professional curriculum standards, the education authority has not yet made clear guiding opinions. In the construction of professional curriculum system for talent training, universities can often only refer to traditional subject-based education curriculum standards, resulting in unclear levels of school goals, and it is difficult to cultivate an international and competitive high-level that truly meets the needs of economic and social development. Applied Talents. For this reason, this thesis takes the course evaluation standard construction research as the topic, combined with the CDIO model, according to the logical structure of the teaching object itself, combined with the actual situation in the teaching practice, research and propose an applied engineering major that can be used for reference A systematic theoretical framework for the construction of curriculum evaluation standards, and based on this theoretical framework, provides a set of practical cases of professional curriculum standard construction, and conducts exploratory promotion and implementation in 5 majors. Analyze the evaluation scores of the curriculum construction of 5 majors, and give specific measures to improve the evaluation standards of informatization courses, and provide theoretical guidance and practical reference for the construction of relevant professional curriculum standards. VL - 10 IS - 2 ER -