The post-COVID-19 era has witnessed an unprecedented acceleration in digital technology and artificial intelligence (AI), profoundly reshaping the educational landscape. These advancements have transformed not only instructional methods but also the expectations placed on teachers, thereby introducing new layers of complexity to an already demanding profession. This study seeks to explore teacher well-being by identifying and characterising both traditional and emerging pressures experienced by educators in this evolving context. Employing a desktop research approach, the study draws on a focused review of recent academic literature, policy documents, and professional reports. Special emphasis was given to sources addressing the changing nature of teacher stressors in the wake of the global pandemic and rapid technological integration. The findings indicate that while longstanding issues—such as inadequate working conditions, recurring educational reforms, and limited institutional support—continue to impact educators, new stressors have emerged. These include heightened expectations for continuous technological upskilling, increased use of AI in the classroom, and evolving pedagogical demands, often implemented without sufficient training or systemic support. As a result, teachers report higher levels of stress and professional dissatisfaction, underscoring the growing demands of the modern educational environment. The study concludes that the teaching profession has become increasingly complex due to the convergence of traditional and technological pressures. This complexity calls for more effective, structured support mechanisms to ensure educator resilience and instructional quality. By providing a systematic synthesis of the current educational climate, the study offers valuable insights for policymakers, researchers, and educational leaders, laying the foundation for targeted interventions and informed strategies to enhance teacher well-being in an era of continual change.
Published in | Education Journal (Volume 14, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.edu.20251403.19 |
Page(s) | 160-169 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Artificial Intelligence, Contemporary Review, Stressors, Teachers
# | Date | Author(s) | List of stressors |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2020 | [19, 16] | AI integration in teaching, job insecurity, increased workload, concerns about education quality, data privacy, algorithmic bias. This shift is driven by a deeper understanding of the constantly evolving curriculum, educational policies, pedagogical approaches, and technological advancements in education. |
2 | 2019 | [30] | Heavy workloads, limited resources, challenging classroom environments, insufficient support, the increasing emphasis on standardised testing and administrative responsibilities. |
3 | 2018 | [5] | Rapid changes in educational policies, technological advancements, quickly adapting to curriculum changes and new materials, and incorporate technology, increased societal and parental expectations, balancing administrative, extracurricular, and professional development responsibilities. |
4 | 2019 | [53] | According to differentiated instruction is a teaching strategy that considers student readiness, learning preferences, and needs. However, many teachers struggle with integrating differentiation instruction due to lack of resources. To improve teachers' ability to deliver differentiated teaching, a professional development path or curriculum rework should be implemented, offering continuing education, materials, group projects, and differentiation instruction concepts |
5 | 2017 | [11] | Assessment overload, lack of assessment literacy, and technology integration also pose challenges |
6 | 2017 | [49] | Education changes due to disempowerment and administrative objectives, hindering their evaluation of instructional value and feeling inconsistent with their primary purpose of teaching. |
Commonality | Endorsed by pre 2020 | Endorsed by post 2020 |
---|---|---|
AI integration in the teaching profession and incorporate technological increase | #1, 2, 3 = 1 endorsers | #3, 5,=2 endorser |
Heavy work load | #2 = 2 endorser | |
Inadequate working conditions | #2, 4, 5, 6=4 endorses | |
Educational changes | #1, 5 =2 endorses | |
Administrative duties | #1, 2, 4, 5, 6= 5 endorses | |
Limited resources | #2, 4 = 2 endorses | |
Societal expectations | #3 = 1 endorser | #3 = 1 endorser |
Parental expectations | #3= 1 endorser |
AI | Artificial Intelligence |
CPD | Career Professional Development |
COVID-19 | Corona Virus Disease 2019 |
TP | Teaching Profession |
TR | Teaching Role |
[1] | Agha, K. (2017). Work-life balance and job satisfaction: An empirical study focusing on higher education teachers in Oman. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 7(3), 164–171. |
[2] | Agyapong, B., Obuobi-Donkor, G., Burback, L., & Wei, Y. (2022). Stress, burnout, anxiety and depression among teachers: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10706. |
[3] | Alam, A., & Ahmad, M. (2017). The impact of instructional leadership, professional communities and extra responsibilities for teachers on student achievement. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(3), 383–395. |
[4] | Alonazi, S. M. (2017). The role of teachers in promoting learner autonomy in secondary schools in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 10(7), 183–202. |
[5] | Ariffin, T. F. T., Bush, T., & Nordin, H. (2018). Framing the roles and responsibilities of excellent teachers: Evidence from Malaysia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 14–23. |
[6] | Asaloei, S. I., Wolomasi, A. K., & Werang, B. R. (2020). Work-related stress and performance among primary school teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(2), 352–358. |
[7] | Aspelin, J. (2020). Teaching as a way of bonding: A contribution to the relational theory of teaching. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(6), 588–596. |
[8] | Ayalon, A. (2023). Teachers as mentors: Models for promoting achievement with disadvantaged and underrepresented learners by creating community. Taylor & Francis. |
[9] | Bakar, R. (2018). The influence of professional teachers on Padang vocational school learners' achievement. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(1), 67–72. |
[10] | Baird, J. A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 317–350. |
[11] | Bhamjee, A. (2021). Personal stress management among principals in public and private primary schools [Master’s thesis, University of Johannesburg]. University of Johannesburg Institutional Repository. |
[12] | Basu Thakur, C. (2021). Project based learning as a teaching and learning method for middle school ELLs. |
[13] | Bergmark, U., & Westman, S. (2018). Student participation within teacher education: Emphasising democratic values, engagement and learning for a future profession. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1352–1365. |
[14] | Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. |
[15] | Calderhead, J. (2021). The contribution of research on teachers' thinking to the professional development of teachers. In Routledge Library Editions: Education Mini-Set N Teachers & Teacher Education Research (Vol. 220–11). Routledge. |
[16] | Colborne, J. W. (2020). Perceived academic stress and coping strategies among first year psychology students at a tertiary institution [Doctoral dissertation]. |
[17] | Danijela, M. (2018). The teacher’s role and professional development. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 6(2), 33–45. |
[18] | Day, C. (2017). Teachers’ worlds and work: Understanding complexity, building quality. Taylor & Francis. |
[19] | Ertel, W. (2018). Introduction to artificial intelligence. Springer. |
[20] | Estrada-Muñoz, C., Castillo, D., Vega-Muñoz, A., & Boada-Grau, J. (2020). Teacher technostress in the Chilean school system. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5280. |
[21] | Harding, S., Morris, R., Gunnell, D., Ford, T., Hollingworth, W., Tilling, K., & Kidger, J. (2019). Is teachers’ mental health and wellbeing associated with learners’ mental health and wellbeing? Journal of Affective Disorders, 242, 180–187. |
[22] | Harmsen, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., Maulana, R., & Van Veen, K. (2018). The relationship between beginning teachers’ stress causes, stress responses, teaching behaviour and attrition. Teachers and Teaching, 24(6), 626–643. |
[23] | Haydon, T., Leko, M. M., & Stevens, D. (2018). Teacher stress: Sources, effects, and protective factors. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 31(2), 99–108. |
[24] | Helms, C., Pölling, B., Curran, T., & Lorleberg, W. (2018). Desktop research: National literature reviews and analyses of educational resources. |
[25] | Hoboubi, N., Choobineh, A., Ghanavati, F. K., Keshavarzi, S., & Hosseini, A. A. (2017). The impact of job stress and job satisfaction on workforce productivity in an Iranian petrochemical industry. Safety and Health at Work, 8(1), 67–71. |
[26] | Holman, L. F., Nelson, J., & Watts, R. (2019). Organizational variables contributing to school counsellor burnout: An opportunity for leadership, advocacy, collaboration, and systemic change. The Professional Counselor, 9(2), 126–141. |
[27] | Kassymova, G. K., Tokar, O. V., Tashcheva, A. I., Slepukhina, G. V., Gridneva, S. V., Bazhenova, N. G.,... & Arpentieva, M. R. (2019). Impact of stress on creative human resources and psychological counselling in crises. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 13(1), 26–32. |
[28] | Kaupa, S. (2020). The sources and impact of stress of teachers on the performance of learners: The viewpoint of the high school teachers in Khomas Region in Namibia. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, 5(4), 12–16. |
[29] | Lindqvist, H., Weurlander, M., Wernerson, A., & Thornberg, R. (2017). Resolving feelings of professional inadequacy: Student teachers’ coping with distressful situations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 270–279. |
[30] | Longobardi, C., Badenes-Ribera, L., Fabris, M. A., Martinez, A., & McMahon, S. D. (2019). Prevalence of student violence against teachers: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Violence, 9(6), 596–610. |
[31] | MacIntyre, P. D., Ross, J., Talbot, K., Mercer, S., Gregersen, T., & Banga, C. A. (2019). Stressors, personality and wellbeing among language teachers. System, 82, 26–38. |
[32] | Mulhern, C. (2020). Beyond teachers: Estimating individual guidance counsellor’s effects on educational attainment [Unpublished manuscript]. RAND Corporation. |
[33] | Mogboh, V. E. (2017). The teaching profession: An interesting journey. |
[34] | Özdilekler, M. A., Altınay, F., Altınay, Z., & Dağlı, G. (2018). An evaluation of class-teachers’ roles in transferring values. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1043–1058. |
[35] | Pedler, M., Hudson, S., & Yeigh, T. (2020). The teachers' role in student engagement: A review. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 48–62. |
[36] | Postholm, M. B. (2018). Teachers’ professional development in school: A review study. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1522781. |
[37] | Pugach, M. C. (2023). Because teaching matters: An introduction to the profession. John Wiley & Sons. |
[38] | Roebben, B. (2017). Generating hope: The future of the teaching profession in a globalized world. Religious Education, 112(3), 199–206. |
[39] | Rowan, L., Brownlee, J. L., & Ryan, M. (2019). Teaching teachers: What [should] teacher educators “know” and “do” and how and why it matters. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 47(3), 210–215. |
[40] | Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305. |
[41] | Schonfeld, I. S., Bianchi, R., & Luehring-Jones, P. (2017). Consequences of job stress for the mental health of teachers. In T. M. McIntyre, S. E. McIntyre, & D. J. Francis (Eds.), Educator stress: An occupational health perspective (pp. 55–75). Springer. |
[42] | Shanks, R. (2017). Mentoring beginning teachers: Professional learning for mentees and mentors. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 6(3), 158–163. |
[43] | Shaukat, S., & Chowdhury, R. (2020). Teacher educators' perceptions of professional standards: Implementation challenges in Pakistan. Issues in Educational Research, 30(3), 1084–1104. |
[44] | Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Dimensions of teacher burnout: Relations with potential stressors at school. Social Psychology of Education, 20, 775–790. |
[45] | Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers (3rd ed.). ASCD. |
[46] | Takács, J. M., Tolner, N., & Pogátsnik, M. (2023). University teachers' perceptions of AI integration: Insights from a qualitative focus group study. Opus et Educatio, 10(3). |
[47] | Troesch, L. M., & Bauer, C. E. (2017). Second career teachers: Job satisfaction, job stress, and the role of self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 389–398. |
[48] | Tsang, K. K., & Kwong, T. L. (2017). Teachers’ emotions in the context of education reform: Labour process theory and social constructionism. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(6), 841–855. |
[49] | Turoń, K., & Kubik, A. (2021). Business innovations in the new mobility market during the COVID-19 with the possibility of open business model innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 195. |
[50] | Ugwoke, S. C., Eseadi, C., Onuigbo, L. N., Aye, E. N., Akaneme, I. N., Oboegbulem, A. I.,... & Eneh, A. (2018). A rational-emotive stress management intervention for reducing job burnout and dysfunctional distress among special education teachers: An effect study. Medicine, 97(17), e0475. |
[51] | Van der Klink, M., Kools, Q., Avissar, G., White, S., & Sakata, T. (2017). Professional development of teacher educators: What do they do? Findings from an explorative international study. Professional Development in Education, 43(2), 163–178. |
[52] | Van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Frèrejean, J., Dolmans, D., van Merriënboer, J., & Visscher, A. J. (2019). Capturing the complexity of differentiated instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1), 51–67. |
[53] | Volungis, A. M., & Goodman, K. (2017). School violence prevention: Teachers establishing relationships with learners using counselling strategies. SAGE Open, 7(1), 2158244017700460. |
[54] | Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2021). Classroom management scripts: A theoretical model contrasting expert and novice teachers’ knowledge and awareness of classroom events. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 131–148. |
[55] | Wong, V. W., Ruble, L. A., Yu, Y., & McGrew, J. H. (2017). Too stressed to teach? Teaching quality, student engagement, and IEP outcomes. Exceptional Children, 83(4), 412–427. |
[56] | Yangözi, O., & Ünalii, B. (2023). The main stressors of tertiary level EFL teachers teaching remotely amidst COVID-19. Indexing/Abstracting, 19(1), 205. |
[57] | Zamir, S. (2018). A teaching career: Mobility and stagnation. Athens Journal of Education, 5(2), 145–160. |
APA Style
Merwe, Y. J. V. D., Klinck2, K. (2025). Stressors Amongst Teachers: A Contemporary. Education Journal, 14(3), 160-169. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20251403.19
ACS Style
Merwe, Y. J. V. D.; Klinck2, K. Stressors Amongst Teachers: A Contemporary. Educ. J. 2025, 14(3), 160-169. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20251403.19
@article{10.11648/j.edu.20251403.19, author = {Yolande Jane van der Merwe and Kezell Klinck2}, title = {Stressors Amongst Teachers: A Contemporary }, journal = {Education Journal}, volume = {14}, number = {3}, pages = {160-169}, doi = {10.11648/j.edu.20251403.19}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20251403.19}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.edu.20251403.19}, abstract = {The post-COVID-19 era has witnessed an unprecedented acceleration in digital technology and artificial intelligence (AI), profoundly reshaping the educational landscape. These advancements have transformed not only instructional methods but also the expectations placed on teachers, thereby introducing new layers of complexity to an already demanding profession. This study seeks to explore teacher well-being by identifying and characterising both traditional and emerging pressures experienced by educators in this evolving context. Employing a desktop research approach, the study draws on a focused review of recent academic literature, policy documents, and professional reports. Special emphasis was given to sources addressing the changing nature of teacher stressors in the wake of the global pandemic and rapid technological integration. The findings indicate that while longstanding issues—such as inadequate working conditions, recurring educational reforms, and limited institutional support—continue to impact educators, new stressors have emerged. These include heightened expectations for continuous technological upskilling, increased use of AI in the classroom, and evolving pedagogical demands, often implemented without sufficient training or systemic support. As a result, teachers report higher levels of stress and professional dissatisfaction, underscoring the growing demands of the modern educational environment. The study concludes that the teaching profession has become increasingly complex due to the convergence of traditional and technological pressures. This complexity calls for more effective, structured support mechanisms to ensure educator resilience and instructional quality. By providing a systematic synthesis of the current educational climate, the study offers valuable insights for policymakers, researchers, and educational leaders, laying the foundation for targeted interventions and informed strategies to enhance teacher well-being in an era of continual change. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Stressors Amongst Teachers: A Contemporary AU - Yolande Jane van der Merwe AU - Kezell Klinck2 Y1 - 2025/06/23 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20251403.19 DO - 10.11648/j.edu.20251403.19 T2 - Education Journal JF - Education Journal JO - Education Journal SP - 160 EP - 169 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2327-2619 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20251403.19 AB - The post-COVID-19 era has witnessed an unprecedented acceleration in digital technology and artificial intelligence (AI), profoundly reshaping the educational landscape. These advancements have transformed not only instructional methods but also the expectations placed on teachers, thereby introducing new layers of complexity to an already demanding profession. This study seeks to explore teacher well-being by identifying and characterising both traditional and emerging pressures experienced by educators in this evolving context. Employing a desktop research approach, the study draws on a focused review of recent academic literature, policy documents, and professional reports. Special emphasis was given to sources addressing the changing nature of teacher stressors in the wake of the global pandemic and rapid technological integration. The findings indicate that while longstanding issues—such as inadequate working conditions, recurring educational reforms, and limited institutional support—continue to impact educators, new stressors have emerged. These include heightened expectations for continuous technological upskilling, increased use of AI in the classroom, and evolving pedagogical demands, often implemented without sufficient training or systemic support. As a result, teachers report higher levels of stress and professional dissatisfaction, underscoring the growing demands of the modern educational environment. The study concludes that the teaching profession has become increasingly complex due to the convergence of traditional and technological pressures. This complexity calls for more effective, structured support mechanisms to ensure educator resilience and instructional quality. By providing a systematic synthesis of the current educational climate, the study offers valuable insights for policymakers, researchers, and educational leaders, laying the foundation for targeted interventions and informed strategies to enhance teacher well-being in an era of continual change. VL - 14 IS - 3 ER -